Reading Comprehension and Digital Books: Jury Still Out

Reading Comprehension: Better on Kindle or Paper?

According to a recent study, reading on paper produces better comprehension than reading a PDF on a shiny monitor.

According to a recenter study, “While the type of E Ink used in the latest generation of Kindles and other tablets has been shown to be as or even more legible than printed text, other studies have indicated that — in terms of reading comprehension — the medium doesn’t much matter.”

Or if you’re the Guardian, you interpret the same data a different way: “A new study which found that readers using a Kindle were “significantly” worse than paperback readers at recalling when events occurred in a mystery story.”

Here’s a chart via the NYT that shows the data:

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/08/14/arts/reading-literature-on-screen-a-price-for-convenience.html
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/08/14/arts/reading-literature-on-screen-a-price-for-convenience.html

For further breakdown, check out The Digital Reader’s take on it.

I think it’s safe to conclude that the jury is still out.

One thought on “Reading Comprehension and Digital Books: Jury Still Out

  1. This is quite intriguing, You’re a very qualified blogger.
    I’ve joined your feed and anticipate seeking far more of
    the great article. Also, your internet site was provided by I’ve within my social support
    systems!

Comments are closed.